Session 6
This topic comes up every year at most school sites. What types of technology do we need to get and why will it be beneficial? Teachers are starting to learn that certain types of technology are important in the classrooms, but they fail to see how other types of technology can also be useful in meeting the needs of the students.
The three concerns that Dr. Newberry pointed out are the same points I see at my school: lack of computers, time and training. As I have stated in past blogs, my school is pretty tech savvy in which means, we have computers in every classroom and all the teachers are using the computers because we are a paperless school and so this is their only means to receive information. However, even the most technological school has these same issues to deal with. As stated in the podcast, even if the teacher has all the technology that can benefit them and their students, it still raises concerns. Such as classroom management, training, availability and students knowledge. I agree with my teachers at my school site when they say, "it just takes so long to get the students use to the computer and to teach them how to navigate through it." Of course it does, it took me a while to learn the computer and I am not in Elementary school. I tell my teachers that teaching them to read, do math, learn history and to play with science all takes time too. Nevertheless we continue to do it---why? Because we have to? No, because we want them to learn and to build on their skills so eventually they can go on and graduate high school. So why not teach them computers also---a skill that will not only help them to graduate high school, but a skill that will continue to grow and get them a higher paying job someday. People that are technology knowledgeable are in higher demand today that ever before. Teaching a child will prepare them for a better job and future. I also remind them that learning the basics is all they need to know in Elementary. You don't need to go out there and teach them how to build websites for monster corporations. Teach the word, excel, power point, publisher and the rest will just happen as they build their confidence and knowledge of the computer.
Even though we have computers in every classroom, I continue to hear that there are not enough computers and/or the computers that they do have are outdated and not working. This I would say is a proxy barrier. Often times a warning will pop up on the computer (need to update the anti-virus software) and the teacher turns it off and never uses it again. This type of barrier is not helping the teacher nor the student. The teacher can simply ask another teacher to come help them, or ask someone on the tech committee to help them. But they do nothing and that technology is gone to waste. Then when the budget comes out and we are deciding what we need, that teacher will state that they have a broken computer in their room. We go in turn it on, update the software and there- a new computer. I think at my school, teachers would like to have about five computers per room, but for now we have at least three computers per room and a full working computer lab with thirty-four computers.
Lack of time is another huge concern. Teachers and administrators always say that they would love to purchase the newer technologies out there, but who is going to show them how to use it and when in their busy daily schedule are they actually going to have the students using it? We hold about three technology trainings each year where we show teachers how to troubleshoot, use LCD projectors, navigate through PowerPoint and how to create newsletters with Publisher. I would love to hold a training, to show them how to create basic webpages...Again--- time? I tell the teachers, just like you prep for all the subjects that you are teaching, prep a PowerPoint presentation and instead of running off those extra worksheets to give as a review, show them the PowerPoint that you created, and I guarantee that you will have full class participation and each child will walk out of there learning more than they would have with just an extra worksheet. I can see this as an actual barrier, just because we don't have time to show teachers how to use the technology unless they want to learn on their own time. This also covers the issue of training at the sametime. The lack of trainers and the time they need to prepare a lesson for the teachers.
These are all common issues I think you would find at most schools today. You always want what you don't have and then when you have it, you don't know what to do with it.
Activity log:
I am starting to work on and finish my Focus Project one and three. I am still putting together information that I will need to complete Focus Project two. I posted blogs on three peers blogs as well.
This topic comes up every year at most school sites. What types of technology do we need to get and why will it be beneficial? Teachers are starting to learn that certain types of technology are important in the classrooms, but they fail to see how other types of technology can also be useful in meeting the needs of the students.
The three concerns that Dr. Newberry pointed out are the same points I see at my school: lack of computers, time and training. As I have stated in past blogs, my school is pretty tech savvy in which means, we have computers in every classroom and all the teachers are using the computers because we are a paperless school and so this is their only means to receive information. However, even the most technological school has these same issues to deal with. As stated in the podcast, even if the teacher has all the technology that can benefit them and their students, it still raises concerns. Such as classroom management, training, availability and students knowledge. I agree with my teachers at my school site when they say, "it just takes so long to get the students use to the computer and to teach them how to navigate through it." Of course it does, it took me a while to learn the computer and I am not in Elementary school. I tell my teachers that teaching them to read, do math, learn history and to play with science all takes time too. Nevertheless we continue to do it---why? Because we have to? No, because we want them to learn and to build on their skills so eventually they can go on and graduate high school. So why not teach them computers also---a skill that will not only help them to graduate high school, but a skill that will continue to grow and get them a higher paying job someday. People that are technology knowledgeable are in higher demand today that ever before. Teaching a child will prepare them for a better job and future. I also remind them that learning the basics is all they need to know in Elementary. You don't need to go out there and teach them how to build websites for monster corporations. Teach the word, excel, power point, publisher and the rest will just happen as they build their confidence and knowledge of the computer.
Even though we have computers in every classroom, I continue to hear that there are not enough computers and/or the computers that they do have are outdated and not working. This I would say is a proxy barrier. Often times a warning will pop up on the computer (need to update the anti-virus software) and the teacher turns it off and never uses it again. This type of barrier is not helping the teacher nor the student. The teacher can simply ask another teacher to come help them, or ask someone on the tech committee to help them. But they do nothing and that technology is gone to waste. Then when the budget comes out and we are deciding what we need, that teacher will state that they have a broken computer in their room. We go in turn it on, update the software and there- a new computer. I think at my school, teachers would like to have about five computers per room, but for now we have at least three computers per room and a full working computer lab with thirty-four computers.
Lack of time is another huge concern. Teachers and administrators always say that they would love to purchase the newer technologies out there, but who is going to show them how to use it and when in their busy daily schedule are they actually going to have the students using it? We hold about three technology trainings each year where we show teachers how to troubleshoot, use LCD projectors, navigate through PowerPoint and how to create newsletters with Publisher. I would love to hold a training, to show them how to create basic webpages...Again--- time? I tell the teachers, just like you prep for all the subjects that you are teaching, prep a PowerPoint presentation and instead of running off those extra worksheets to give as a review, show them the PowerPoint that you created, and I guarantee that you will have full class participation and each child will walk out of there learning more than they would have with just an extra worksheet. I can see this as an actual barrier, just because we don't have time to show teachers how to use the technology unless they want to learn on their own time. This also covers the issue of training at the sametime. The lack of trainers and the time they need to prepare a lesson for the teachers.
These are all common issues I think you would find at most schools today. You always want what you don't have and then when you have it, you don't know what to do with it.
Activity log:
I am starting to work on and finish my Focus Project one and three. I am still putting together information that I will need to complete Focus Project two. I posted blogs on three peers blogs as well.
12 Comments:
At 5:11 PM,
Rosa said…
Hi Jennie,
What you say about your school is definitely wide spread. So many schools spend thousands of dollars on technology equipment to incorporate into the classroom but do not make the same investment into training the users. Many schools leave it for the teachers to learn on their own time and by themselves. The results of this approach will vary tremendously, making some teachers very successful while others struggle and finally give up.
At 2:44 PM,
Edgar Chabolla said…
Hi Jennie,
The teacher profession has a special situtation when it comes to technology use. In other industries if an employee does not adapt to online trainings and using enterprise resource systems such as peoplesoft or oracle they can be easily laid off. On the other hand in teaching the use of technology is not much more effective than traditional ways and therefore some teachers and administrators do not put a great effort behind the use of technology that for most of them is a novelty not an asset to learning.
At 5:53 PM,
Cassandra said…
I think that teachers who are not use to using technology get scared when they see the warning lights and think they did something wrong and don't want to deal with the problem.
At 7:24 PM,
De Nguyen Blog said…
Hi Jennie,
I notice that the problem with time barrier happens just about everywhere. All the teachers are on a very tight schedule. In between classes, they must fulfill so many other duties and works with no specific name. Most of the classrooms are well equipped. Sometimes teachers do not use any or some of the technology. Personally, I do not think that teachers are lazy or do not have the desire to learn. They are just simply do not have time.
I think that the administration should get involve and create opportunity for the teachers to up date their skills for better performing their duty.
De Nguyn
At 8:32 PM,
Dorothy Oliver said…
Hi Jennie,
I would love to have a computer with Internet, power point, excel, assess, publisher for all of my students-but at this point it is impossible. Until internet can develop a security that will not allow email, surfing to any website that is not instructional we will not have access to it.
We have computers in my class but students can only access the PLATO Learning Lab. When they first enroll and get started with this application, they are excited, but after a few weeks it becomes boring to adults to do virtually the same thing over and over.
I try to make learning with the same application fun. By timing the completion of exercises, having students search for a particular lesson in a given time period and so on.
Not all schools are equiped with computers that will allow for innovation, even if the student and teacher is ready. I work with the overhead projector, allowing students to write on the transparencies; I including artwork in those numerous worksheet I must run off; and I allow them to create drawings that I put on the computer then download and give to them, including power point presentations. That the best at this point I can do.
At 8:35 AM,
James said…
Hi Jennie,
You comments are very common. There are a lot of teachers in the college level that believe that teaching computers to college bound students is too difficult for them to leave and they have a very difficult time grasping the concepts. Even some students who do not like working with the computers prefer the traditional courses versus the online or hybrid classes because of this barrier.
Our school is going paperless as well and I am hearing some of the same comments from the instructors at the community college that you hear from the teachers in the elementary level. I guess we can never satisfy all teachers, can we?
James
At 10:38 PM,
Davena Peters said…
A paperless school...wow. That actually sounds really cool, I just wonder how you can get a school to go paperless, yet cannot get all of the staff on board with the technology in other areas? Edgar made a point here on your blog that it may be related to the attitude of the administration. If they do not give the staff an option of going paperless or not, they are forced to go along. Maybe the same should happen with other technology areas, such as having evaluations include technology integration. Seems to me like there is too much fear in regards to technolgy overall, but at the same time I think we all need to remember we are in this program for a reason. We like technology and are very excited and motivated by such, others are not and do not see our world in the same way. I guess there may be some Math instructors out there whom are motivated and excited by their topic and wonder why we have so many people struggling in the subject matter. When looking at it from this perspective, we can see that not everyone is cut out for the Early Adopter Club, but we can sure try to pull them closer. :-)
Davena
At 3:05 PM,
RFLORES said…
Hello Jennie,
I am in complete agreement with Rosa's comments regarding the acquisition of infrastructure, wihtout paying attention to the fact that training in a critical aspect of technology integration. Acquisition of infrastructure without regard for training is definitely irresponsible. The correct sequence is: acquisition, training, imparting. Sequencing other than the one I explained results in a less-desirable, less efficient way of integrating technology in the classrom.
I believe it is irresponsible for administrators to leave it to instructors to figure out how to learn the new technology as it is being acquired. sure, instructors are capable to figure out how to use it. However, learning how to use technology on our own is not the most efficient way to accomplish this task, for it brings the instructor to the level of the student.
Teachers are already very busy figuring out ways to impart their courses and classroom lectures. Please, give teachers a break! They need to learn how to use technology from technology experts. Instructors are then able to pick up technology quickly and they can in turn, incorporate this technology in the classroom fast.
At 6:17 PM,
Anita K. said…
Hi Jennie!
As I have said many times before, "I like your school and how they use technology!!" You made some good points. Your mention of allowing students to use the computers is hard to do at the secondary level. The students have access to the internet and although we have blocks in place, the students know the passwords and key strokes to unlock the sites that are blocked. When they do this, we teachers get dinged because the district has someone that looks to see if there is internet activity during instruction time even though the math sites (which are district allowed) are sometimes being used. Any suggestions??
At 1:15 PM,
Brian said…
Jennie,
In proofreading this it seems a little harsh. I’m just soap-boxing and this isn’t meant as a criticism of you personally.
I had just finished reading Robert Flores’ comments about teachers’ time when I read your post about teachers and computer woes vis-à-vis anti-virus definitions and such. It occurred to me that what you describe may indicate problems with site policy rather than the teachers. For example, a CHP officer rolling out on a shift doesn’t have to worry if her patrol car is due for an oil change and a radiator flush, and she certainly isn’t expected to perform those services. Because the car is a tool and not the principle function of the job, designated support personnel manage the equipment and perform preventative and corrective maintenance. Why should a teacher have to take time and energy away from students and direct it toward computer maintenance? If that teacher gets help from another teacher, then you’ve doubled the time spent by teachers doing someone else’s job. Teacher’s can-do attitude and willingness to go above and beyond for their students can make them easy prey for administrators and bureaucrats who won’t provide them with proper support services (and training.)
In my job we do process mapping and task analysis and one of the tricks of the trade is have the workers look at their jobs as if they were lawyers. If a teacher is a lawyer then a student is a client. Everything thing that you do should be able to be billed to the students in the same way that lawyers track their billable hours. Those tasks that can’t be billed may be someone else’s job (usually someone in a lower pay band.) Updating anti-virus definitions, troubleshooting network connections, and installing software all fall into this category. The only reason it is cheaper for some schools to have teachers do these tasks is because they haven’t hired the support staff and teachers are basically either doing it for free or at the students’ expense.
At 6:53 PM,
Coach lynn said…
Hello Jennie,
I agree that what you stated is wide spread. At our site, for example, we spent about $110,000 at the end of last year for new computers and SuccessMaker software. We only spent two half days in training on how to use the software and most teachers at the middle school have stopped requiring the use in the classroom. There are only a few of use that will still "find time" to use computers or software to reinforce student learning.
Robert
At 5:21 PM,
Brian Newberry said…
What a good discussion. Training is often an issue that is raised as a barrier. We might forget that not everyone is like us, in that we know how to teach ourselves how to use new technologies.
Brian makes some interesting points about the need for making sure that the tools work. Again, not everyone likes to get in the guts of a computer like some of us do.
What do you think about Edgar's observation that schools can't remove teachers who don't use technology like a business might?
Post a Comment
<< Home